> > The latter has been formulated as draft-11 of the Attribute Sharing
> > Profile.
>
> As agreed on the call yesterday, I'm prepared to retract this document
> set from the repository. If someone could provide some guidance for
> doing so, I'd be grateful.
>
> - Should I simply delete the documents? This will break links so I'm
> not sure if this is the best approach. Please advise.
[RSP] I don't feel you should delete the existing doc's. The repository
should keep all files as they were loaded.
>
> - I will create a new set of documents with a different document ID.
> What is the proper attribution for this new set of documents? Should
> the editors and contributors from the "SAML V2.0 Attribute Sharing
> Profile for X.509-based Authentication Systems" be carried over into
> the new "SAML V2.0 Profiles for X.509 Subjects", or should we start
> from scratch?
[RSP] As of rev -11, you renamed the profile from
sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-10 to
sstc-saml2-profiles-x509-draft-11.
I would go back to the old name and create a rev-11 based on the
con-call discussion. Then, for the new grid-specific deployment profile,
I would choose a different unambiguous name.
If we are thinking of adding various "deployment profiles" (e.g. this
one, grid), then perhaps we should create a name structure that reflects
their purpose. It might help eliminate confusion with other profile
documents we already have.
Suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom Scavo
> NCSA/University of Illinois
