Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [security-services] SAML IPR statements have been revised toexplicit "defensive suspension"

From
Jeff Hodges <>
Date
2006-06-21T15:48:11+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [security-services] SAML IPR statements have been revised toexplicit "defensive suspension"
And to further cover very appropriate bases, I must apologize to Conor Cahill 
and AOL -- it was their original "defensive suspension" statement as of 
December 22, 2004 [1] (scroll to mid-page) that led the pack on this, and was 
used as a model for the subsequent such statements from RSA, Fidelity, and Sun.

Thanks AOL!

JeffH

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/ipr.php
Next in thread → Next in month →