Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [security-services] Agenda for 25-Oct SSTC con-call

From
Jahan Moreh <>
Date
2005-10-24T22:44:28+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [security-services] Agenda for 25-Oct SSTC con-call
I will try to publish Draft 18 later 
tonight....

 

Jahan

  

  
  From: Philpott, Robert 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 
  3:27 PM
To: 
  
Subject: [security-services] 
  Agenda for 25-Oct SSTC con-call

  

  

  
Dial in info: +1 865 
  673 6950; Access code: 270-9441#

  
 

  
    
Roll 
    call 
    
Approve minutes of 11-Oct 
    con-call: 
    
      
RE: 
      [security-services] Minutes for SSTC Conference Call, October 
      11 
      

    
Errata 
    Review (Jahan): 

    
      
Current 
      rev is draft 17 posted prior to 11-Oct 
      meeting. 

      
Status of 
      updates from 11-Oct meeting? 
      

  
                                                               
  i.      
  AI’s: 
  231, 236

  
                                                             
  ii.      
  Clarification on 
  Action element 
  - Jahan to capture this 
  as an errata item.

  
    
      
Should we 
      produce red-line versions of spec’s 
      soon? 
      

    
Scott: Strawman proposal on third-party 
    AuthnRequest 

    
Scott: Some food for thought on 
    delegation 

    
Package for 
    upcoming CD vote: 
    
      
Rob: Tech 
      Overview status – Still working on updates.  Not ready for 
      review. 

      
Eve: 
      XPath CD draft? 

    
Eve: FAQ 
    update (see AI 235): 

    
      
Could use advise 
      on changing the SAML FAQ 
      

    
Abbie/Prateek: 
    Submission 
    to ITU-T 

    
Miscellaneous: 

    
      
Comment 
      list: Public 
      Comment 

      
OASIS Press Inquiry: TC 
      response to Gartner’s March’05 Report? 
    

  
                                                               
  i.      
  An 
  editor from Computer Weekly, a UK IT publication, is writing an article on new 
  approaches to network security. He asks if we can provide an official TC 
  response to Gartner's March report, which says "much more must be done before 
  SAML can be considered anything more than just another security token format 
  and yet another set of protocols... very few real-world production 
  applications rely on it". He also asks if there's any synergy between SAML and 
  the Jericho Forum's work.

  
                                                             
  ii.      
  Is this 
  something the Adoption SC could addresss?

  
    
AI Review: See attached 
    list 
    
Other 
    business? 
    
Adjourn 
    

  
 

  
#0237: Interop 
  Test question: Metadata 2.0 EndpointType question Owner: Eric Tiffany

  
11-Oct: Option "A" in the list email is the preferred 
  interpretation. Eric to propose text

  
 

  
#0235: Various 
  Editorial Changes Owner: Eve 
  Maler

  
11-Oct: Still not quite done. Eve is breaking FAQ into 
  a Questions and Answers format. Expects to post revised XPath draft soon so it 
  can be linked from the web page.

  
 

  
#0234: Nick to 
  prepare some text for PE 23. Owner: Nick Ragouzis*

  
 

  
#0230: SAML 
  Conformance SSL/TLS requirements Owner: Eric Tiffany

  
Eric is concerned because implementation will be able 
  to run over TLS, but spec actually says you must implement 
  TLS.

  
 

  
#0224: Re-work 
  X.509 Authn attribute protocol profile to address SSTC comments. Owner: Rob Philpott

  
27-Sep: Sent mail to Rick Randall asking for final 
  decision.

  
 

  
#0216: Formulate 
  some suggested redline text for PE10 for review. Owner: Jahan Moreh

  
30-Aug: Changed AI description: item to be updates is 
  PE10, NOT "E7".

  
 

  
#0180: Need to 
  update SAML server trust document Owner: None

  
 

  
Rob 
  Philpott
Senior Consulting 
  Engineer
RSA 
  Security Inc.
Tel: 781-515-7115
Mobile: 617-510-0893
Fax: 
  781-515-7020
Email: 
  
I-name:  =Rob.Philpott
Next in thread → Next in month →