RE: [security-services] Rob's errata: Conf 2a

> So, it thus does not make sense to list it in the Feature Matrix MTI
> table of Conformance, but would it be useful to list it in the Possible
> Implementations Table 1? It's an informational table that identifies
> similar pairings of messages/bindings/protocols.

Yeah, but I think it's more confusing than helpful. But if you do, I'd put
it in parentheses like:

HTTP artifact (via GET and POST)

-- Scott