RE: [security-services] Authentication Response IssuerName vs. As sertion IssuerName

From
Thomas Wisniewski <>
Date
2005-06-10T14:17:33+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [security-services] Authentication Response IssuerName vs. As sertion IssuerName
Title: RE: [security-services] Authentication Response IssuerName vs. As sertion IssuerName

Conor, what do you do in the case where the Response is not signed but someone is sending you an EncryptedAssertion?

How do you know who the issuer is (particularly if it's an unsolicited Response)?

Tom.

-----Original Message-----

From: Conor P. Cahill [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 8:25 AM

To: Scott Cantor

Cc: 'Thomas Wisniewski'; 

Subject: RE: [security-services] Authentication Response IssuerName vs. As sertion IssuerName

Scott Cantor wrote on 6/9/2005, 8:49 PM:

 > > I am concerned about making this a must.  While I think there  >  > I think it has to be a MUST if you're encrypting, or there's no way to  > know  > who's sent you the assertion. We could add some kind of xenc extension to  > carry something about that, but we didn't do that.

I think it probably should also be a MUST if your signing the response.

My main concern is for when the response isn't signed.

Conor