> The main issue I'm struggling with is conformance support.
> I.e., if we decide not to support any ECP clients and wish to
> be a compliant IDP and SP, this is not possible. Am I reading
> the conformance spec correctly?
I think so, yes. As it was in ID-FF, the enhanced profile was made MTI. I
was just speaking to whether a single filter could handle both profiles for
a single set of content, and I think it can.
> required to support ECP requests. It seems like just
> rejecting the request at the SP with an appropriate soap
> (paos?) error is not what's meant by the conformance requirement.
Obviously, as with anything else.
-- Scott
