Actually, what's the problem with making ID a SHOULD instead of MUST?
-Greg
On Aug 6, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Scott Cantor wrote:
>> I can support this change. Certainly this prepares us better for a
>> future world in which xml:id is a standard, so we've got at least one
>> use case to hang this on.
>
> I wish that was my motivation, but that's not really the case. We
> can't add
> xml:id without also removing the unqualified ID, so unless we made ID
> optional now (unlikely, I'd say), we're still stuck.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
> of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/
> members/leave_workgroup.php.
