Scott,
I will draw them all any way. Then later we can decide which to include and
produce a description. At least this way we can validate whether the way I
have interpreted the profiles/bindings combinations is they were intended to
be described.
Hopefully I should be able to post all the diagrams either later today - or
tomorrow.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:]
> Sent: 30 June 2004 15:39
> To: 'John Hughes'; 'oasis sstc'
> Subject: RE: [security-services] SAML 2.0 tech overview - initial
> diagrams
>
>
> > The question is whether I should have diagrams/descriptions for
> all of the
> > above. Its not much extra work - as having done a couple of them - the
> > rest will be just variations. They question is rather about the
> > balance between completeness and verbosity.
>
> I tend to think we can stick to the variants we think are most important
> (and probably by extension the ones that are MTI).
>
> -- Scott
