Yikes, this is a big change from how we've been using it, though it does
hew more closely to the WS-I-ish meaning. Actually, our profiles seem
most like "protocols" to me! But I imagine we should stay far away from
this.
I thought our definitions of "binding" and "profile" were fairly clear
and distinct. Agreed that they -- and artifact -- should appear in the
Glossary, though. (I will add an issue to the issues list so we don't
lose this, regardless of how we define them.)
Eve
Rich Salz wrote:
>>The browser profiles seem like a mix of binding and profile now. The content
>>of the messages is a profile, but the rules for exchange seem like a
>>binding.
>
>
> So I noticed. :)
>
> I think the browser profile should really be "browser-oriented binding"
> or some such.
>
> /r$
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Products, Technologies, and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
