RE: [security-services] saml-metadata draft comments

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2004-02-27T15:46:27+00:00
ID
001f01c3fd4a$a665ea10$
Thread
RE: [security-services] saml-metadata draft comments
> I have a few comments reguarding the metadata spec, to whit:

Are these comments wrt to the published draft language or the published
schema?

> - SPDescriptor drops support for the pulication of multiple
> assertionconsumerserviceurl. the uses case (from RSA) which supported
> this design choice, i think, are still quite valid, imho

I'm guessing the draft, since I includes this in my schema. But I heavily
revised (and am still evolving) the methodology for documenting endpoints.

-- Scott