← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Possible 1.1 (and 1.0) errata

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2003-07-31T17:03:21+00:00
ID
005101c35788$2dbdd450$5cf39280@SAIDIN
Thread
Possible 1.1 (and 1.0) errata
It's been pointed out during review of the latest Liberty documents that the
part in SAML about identifier uniqueness is overstated based on the intent.
If the point is to use a SHA1 hash, then the actual collision probability in
the spec language should be <= 2^-80 instead of < 2^-160

Liberty had the same language and it was copied from SAML, so I figured I'd
mention it.

-- Scott
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →