← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
editorial comments on binding and core drafts
I have the following comments on the core draft. I have none for the bindings draft. Overall I thought the drafts looked pretty good. Comments on core-1.1-06 line 1352 replace , by . 1355-1357 suggests that minor versions are backwards compatible. This is not in fact the case with SAML 1.1. Should we call attention to that SAML 1.1 is not backwards compatible with SAML 1.0 admittedly in only a very narrow aspect of the schema. 1398 Is there some additional context here? How can we prevent a SAML requestor from arbitrarily issuing such a request? 1533 Can we identify a specific attribute names here?
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread