> Is it significant though that the SOAP schemas in the W3C submission
> (which I think is what SAML is pointing to as the reference point)
> aren't compliant with the 2001 version? Are there "official" SOAP 1.1
> schemas that are up to date, or is the whole idea non-applicable since
> SOAP 1.1 isn't a standard in that sense?
SOAP 1.1 is a W3C Note, not a W3C standard, of course, so the whole
thing may be moot. Martin Gudgin translated SOAP 1.1 to official Schema
and posted it to the W3C XMLP (soap) list. In fact, he went one better
and updated the documents at http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/
and http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/ . Those were the URL's in
the SOAP 1.1 spec, and are probably the URL's that SAML should
reference. (And if you do an HTTP Get, you'll get the schema's.)
/r$
--
Zolera Systems, http://www.zolera.com
Information Integrity, XML Security
