Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: Substitution Groups Reconsidered
Eve, It will be very good to capture this rationale in your document. Thanks. - joe -----Original Message----- From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 6:35 PM To: Subject: RE: Substitution Groups Reconsidered <snip> Phill and I did agree that it's a good idea to have some non-normative text somewhere explaining the benefits and costs of different extension approaches (substitution group vs. xsi:type). Perhaps this is something I can add to my proposed schema design rationale document.
Next in thread →
Next in month →