Hi,
And if it is a tool kit specification, we can use it for the compliance
and conformance part of S2ML.
cheers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Orchard, David [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:30 PM
> To: Philip Hallam-Baker; 'Anders Rundgren'; S2ML
> Subject: RE: X-TASS - where?
>
>
> I am baffled here. I can't see X-TASS, yet I think I'm being implicitly
> asked to support removal of X-Tass info from S2ML. I have no
> idea what the
> standardization efforts are underway for X-TASS.
>
> Why not just merge X-Tass into S2ML rather than remove S2ML from
> Xtass? We
> have a standards body looking at authentication, why not use it for xtass?
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Philip Hallam-Baker [mailto:]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 10:22 AM
> > To: 'Anders Rundgren'; S2ML
> > Subject: RE: X-TASS - where?
> >
> >
> > XML Trust Assertion Service Specification is a general framework for
> > management of assertions. It is one of the design documents
> > which was input
> > to the S2ML.
> >
> > At the moment I am revising the draft to remove the
> > authorization examples
> > since the plan is that S2ML/Auth-XML will serve that
> > particular application.
> > The intention is that X-TASS provide a toolkit on which other
> > specs can draw
> > rather than being tied to any one application.
> >
> > It will be some time before the 1.0 draft is ready but I can
> > send anyone who
> > is interested a copy of the 0.9 draft as a pre-print.
> >
> > Anyone know a good XML conference [1] with a call for papers open?
> >
> > Phill
> >
> > [1] i.e. in a location not submerged under two feet of snow
> > like Boston is
> > at present.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Anders Rundgren [mailto:]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 1:55 AM
> > > To: S2ML
> > > Subject: X-TASS - where?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > The v.08a spec. refers to something called X-TASS but I can't
> > > find it anywhere.
> > >
> > > /anders
> > >
> >
>
