Miko Matsumura wrote:
>Interesting declaration on the future of UDDI/ebXML RegRep coexistence solutions from UDDI TC Chair Luc Clement on the UDDI Dev board...
>
>
Thanks for sharing Miko.
Discussion is being conducted on the OASIS uddi-dev list which is open
for any one to join and post.
Archive of thread is at:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-dev/200506/msg00005.html
Feel free to share your perspective on that list specially if you have
had a chance
to use both UDDI and ebXML Registry. To post you must join the uddi-dev
list at:
http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php
Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luc Clement [mailto:]
> Sent: Thu 6/23/2005 3:37 AM
> To: 'Governor James'; 'J鷨gen Thyme';
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons
>
>
>
> "likely to follow" is entirely speculative on your part. Let me be equally speculative: "no others will".
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Governor James [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:03
> To: J鷨gen Thyme;
> Subject: RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons
>
>
>
> Sun already supports a dual registry strategy, as does infravio. Others are likely to follow, WS-I fud notwithstanding.
>
>
>
> Coexistence is surely the best approach.
>
>
