I did have a look at the Version 1.2 of the Fedora project in early 2004.
Via registration of interest (to get download) I declared my allegiance
with the ebXMLRegistry TC. They may or may not have followed through and
looked at the TC materials.
I consider their work as being orthogonal .. the obvious intersecting
point being management of artifacts.
carl
<quote who="Chiusano Joseph">
> Thanks Farrukh - I was just about to send that same announcement myself.
> I definitely see some parallels in their features to our v3.0 specs.
> Some of their support is academic (university-based).
>
> Kind Regards,
> Joseph Chiusano
> Booz Allen Hamilton
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com <http://www.boozallen.com/>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:]
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 6:21 AM
> To:
> Subject: [regrep] Fedora repository project
>
>
>
> This caught my attention in Cover pages:
>
> http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-03-18-a.html
>
>
> * Fedora Repository Service [server]
> <http://www.fedora.info/download/2.0/userdocs/server/index.html>
> * Fedora Repository Web Service Interfaces
> <http://www.fedora.info/download/2.0/userdocs/server/features/features.h
> tml>
>
>
> Anyone have any more insights or contacts with this community?
> If so we should try to
> make them aware of ebXML Registry 3.0 standard and see if there
> is interest in supporting
> it.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: For
> additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
--
Carl Mattocks
co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC
co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC
CEO CHECKMi
v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
www.CHECKMi.com
Semantically Smart Compendiums
[AOL] IM CarlCHECKMi
