Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
>We don't have a meeting scheduled for tomorrow. Can this be resolved via e-mail? I can set up a special meeting if needed, but it would not be at the usual time nor with the usual numbers.
>
>
email approval of this and other comments is fine. The other comments
and their proposed resolution compiled by Richard is here:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/download.php/11480/regrep-3.0-comments.html
Please let us know if you have any concerns over the proposed
resolutions by COB Thursday. This will allow Richard and I to
compile final deliverables in time for next week. Thanks.
>
>Kathryn Breininger
>Boeing Library Services
>425-965-0182 phone
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 1:56 PM
>To:
>Subject: [regrep] Proposed resolution to Diego Ballvé's public comment
>
>
>Following is the proposed resolution for the recent comment submitted by
>Diego Ballvé . Please review so we can resolve it in tomorrow's meeting.
>Thanks.
>
>Hi Diego,
>
>Thanks for your valuable comment. Please see response inline below
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Comment from:
>>
>>[MINOR] Fix typo on SQL query compliance level
>>
>>================================================
>>
>>File: regrep-3.0-cd-01/specs/regrep-rs-3.0-cd-01.pdf
>>
>>Section: 6.4, SQL Query Syntax
>>
>>Line: 1893
>>
>>
>>
>>Fix typo on SQL compliance level: "Entry Level SQL" should be
>>
>>"Intermediate Level SQL", since the registry normative Schema is
>>obviously based on
>>
>>Intermediate
>>
>>Level SQL.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Thank you for pointing out this typographical error. We will replace
>
>"Entry Level SQL" with "Intermediate Level SQL" at line 1893
>
>as you suggest.
>
>
>
>>Also, I suggest removing non-normative SQL BNF in section 6.4.1
>>
>>as it creates potential for inconsistencies. If possible, reference
>>
>>the "official" SQL BNF defined in the SQL92 specs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>We agree with above suggestion and will remove the non-normative SQL BNF
>in section 6.4.1.
>We will also include a reference to the SQL BNF in the SQL92 specs
>already included in the
>Normative References section.
>
>Thanks for helping us improve our specifications.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Farrukh
