Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
> Many of the samples forwarded earlier by Kathryn did not contain such
> wording. In order to include that wording, I may have to contact my
> legal department.
Well there sure is ample precedence. Also I assume all submisions MUST
implictly be consistent with *ALL* OASIS policies including IPR
(otherwise they would not be valid submissions) so I may well be wrong
here about this being a requirement in the wording.
>
> -Matt
> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>
>> Carl Mattocks wrote:
>>
>>> CHECKMi (Lissom inc T/A) has been successfully using the ebXML
>>> Registry 3.0 specifications as approved by the OASIS ebXML Registry
>>> Technical Committee.
>>>
>>> with thanks
>>> carl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> BTW, I think OASIS process MAY require stating soemthing about "in
>> accordance with OASIS IPR Policies" in these statements. At least
>> that is what I was told by Eduardo Gutentag our OASIS representative.
>> See the Sun statement of use for an example.
>>
>> Just an FYI...
>>
>
>
--
Regards,
Farrukh
