<Quote>
for example a "getABIE()" method, has to retrieve full definition components (ABIE with its BBIE and ASBIE properties) in an atomic call.
</Quote>
Why not a "getRegistryObject()"* method with one of the parameters signifying ObjectType of "Core Component"?
*may not be the exact name (sent quickly without opening spec - sorry)
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 12:52 PM
> To:
> Subject: [regrep] RE : [Fwd: [regrep] New ballot "Vote on
> cc-Review subteam report" (WAS RE:[regrep] Standards approval
> process)]
>
> Thanks Farrukh, we agree to edit the mapping and to submit a
> draft ASAP to the TC.
>
>
> Only to give an example, please find attached to this mail
> UBL Invoice Structure, which represent a "complete" ABIE.
> The files are :
> - one in EDIFRANCE BS xml format (which isn't 100% compliant
> to CCTS yet...)
> - the other is the BS schema
> - the last is the ebRIM format (it is only an example, the
> inner assosiactions are not provided in the file)
>
> The ebRIM format shows why I spoke about a dedicated API for
> CC. When I retrieve a generic CC in reality I need to
> retrieve all associated sub-component and that couldn't be
> done by a simple request provided by the QueryManager In
> fact, for example a "getABIE()" method, has to retrieve full
> definition components (ABIE with its BBIE and ASBIE
> properties) in an atomic call.
>
> Rgards,
> Ivan
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Farrukh Najmi [mailto:] Envoyé :
> lundi 17 janvier 2005 22:16 À :
> Objet : Re: [Fwd: [regrep] New ballot "Vote on cc-Review
> subteam report" (WAS RE:[regrep] Standards approval process)]
>
>
> Resending after fixing the subject per Joe's earlier suggestion.
>
> Sorry I think it was me who replied to the wrong message at
> the begining
> of this thread. Please try and use the subject Joe started in
> response.
>
> Thanks.
>
> BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote:
>
> >I'm sorry but the mapping is not so simple:
> >the better solution for ASCC and ASBIE is an ebRIM association or an
> >extrinsic object ? do we need a dedicated registry object for BCC,
> >BBIE, ASCC, ASBIE properties or an association is enough?
> >Business Context will be a registry classification or an extrinsic
> >object ?
> >
> >
> I think Ivan touches on an important point above... That the
> fundemental issue is the mapping between two information models:
>
> a) The CCTS Information Model (source model)
>
> b) The ebXML Registry Information Model (target model)
>
> Both models are defined in UML and a mapping between the two
> should be the main focus. Such a mapping should be an
> abstract mapping that is independent of Serialization or
> Storage formats at least initialy.
>
> This whole debate about which comes first: Serialization
> format or Storage format is not the core issue to debate IMHO.
>
> Instead we should be debating on the mapping issues between
> the two models (see Iva's examles above) and using the ebXML
> Registry Tutorial:
>
> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/regrep-tutorial-draft-04.pdf
>
> as a key input when trying solution to mapping problems.
>
> BTW, is any one able to take Editorship of above document
> from me as I have become a bottleneck on that document? Ivan,
> would you be interested given that you and your colleagues
> have been using this document since its earliest version and
> have some practical experience with its content?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from
> the roster of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/le
> ave_workgroup.php.
>
>
