Is Demand for ebXML As a Framework Fading? (Was RE: [regrep] Proposed changes to ebMS Binding and HTTP Binding)

[Changing name of thread, as I see a separate but important issue here]

<Quote>
It makes very little sense to spend any ore time on something very few
are wanting.  We should not be arrogant in the endeavor to make
everything appear ebXML-ish at the cost of sound technical reasoning and
customer requirements.
</Quote>

Hmmm...does this mean that the demand for ebXML as a framework is
fading?

Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Nickull [mailto:] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 11:05 AM
> To: Farrukh Najmi
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: [regrep] Proposed changes to ebMS Binding and 
> HTTP Binding
> 
> 
> 
> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> 
> > I do not think it sends a negative message. 
> 
> I would concur with this.  It makes very little sense to 
> spend any ore time on something very few are wanting.  We 
> should not be arrogant in the endeavor to make everything 
> appear ebXML-ish at the cost of sound technical reasoning and 
> customer requirements.
> 
> If I have two tools - a small hammer and a sledgehammer, I 
> will use a different one depending on whether I hang a small 
> nail for a picture frame or take out a iron railing.
> 
> Duane
> 
> 
> 
> --
> ***********
> Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - 
> http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - 
> http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC - 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa
> ***********
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from 
> the roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/le
> ave_workgroup.php.
> 
>