Re: [regrep] Proposed changes to ebMS Binding and HTTP Binding

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

>> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>
>>> 2. Based on implementation experience I think we should drop 
>>> bindings for all registry protocol methods that require HTTP POST 
>>> from ebRS for the following reasons:
>>
>> Does this entail that there is room for GETting a RegRep resource 
>> through a URL?
>
> All regrep resources have been accessible via HTTP GET since version 
> 2.5 modulo access control / authorization.
> My proposal has no negative impact on that important requirement you 
> mention.

Thanks fo the clarification. Then its seems like relevant suggestions. 
Web Services should provide sufficient means for management tasks.

thanks
/anders