Farrukh:
This is probably prudent. Can we partially rely on or ensure compliance
with the work of WS-I for the basic profile?
Duane
Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>
> During my implementation of freebXML Registry I have found that our
> specs need to define the algorithm by which Registry Exceptions and
> Errors are mapped to SOAP Faults in the SOAP Binding.
>
> In the absence of a binding to SOAP Faults it is difficult to write
> decent error handling in Registry Client applications.
> Often all you can do is check whether an error occurred or not but
> cannot easily determine the type of Error and take
> Error specific actions.
>
> I propose that we define a brief section (< 1 page) that describes a
> normative binding from Registry Errors / Exceptions to SOAP Faults.
> If the TC agrees that this is a good idea then I will be glad if
> someone wishes to write the mapping spec. If not, then I will be glad
> to take the Action Item.
>
--
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa
***********
