regressed with regrets....
D
David RR Webber wrote:
> Regrest?
>
> Is that some new feature in V3.0?
>
> DW
>
> Duane Nickull wrote:
>
>> Regrest. I am in San Jose presenting Registry.
>>
>> Duane
>>
>> Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
>>
>>> This is a reminder and the agenda for our telecon today, Thursday,
>>> September 2nd, from 1:30-3:30 pm PT. Call in information is below.
>>>
>>> USA domestic toll free number: 1-866-235-8350
>>> International number: 206-655-2988
>>> Pass code: 669014#
>>> Here is the phone number for the operator if you have any problems:
>>> 206-655-2254.
>>> Agenda:
>>> 1. Minute taker
>>>
>>> 2. Minutes from last meeting
>>>
>>> 3. eGov report
>>>
>>> 4. WSRP report
>>>
>>> 5. cc Review subcommittee report
>>>
>>> 6. SAML discussion <<Re: [regrep] SAML support in ebXML
>>> Registry: By Ed Buchinski et. al>>
>>>
>>> 7. Comments on specs discussion
>>> 8. Interop demos (please see David's e-mail)
>>>
>>> 9. Charter review
>>>
>>> 10. Other issues/items
>>>
>>> 11. Next meeting
>>>
>>>
>>> Please let me know if there are additional items for the agenda.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kathryn Breininger
>>> CENTRAL Project Manager
>>> Emerging Technologies
>>> Boeing Library Services
>>>
>>> 425-965-0182 phone
>>> 425-237-3491 fax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Re: [regrep] SAML support in ebXML Registry: By Ed Buchinski et. al
>>> From:
>>> "Farrukh Najmi" <>
>>> Date:
>>> Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:45:29 -0700
>>> To:
>>> "Breininger, Kathryn R" <>
>>>
>>>
>>> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> TC Members,
>>>>
>>>> Per my action item from last TC meeting I have been digging deeper
>>>> into the issue of SAML support for ebXML Registry.
>>>> Attached is a paper by Ed Buchinski et. al from the Canadian
>>>> Government on the subject. Please share your thoughts
>>>> on this thread. I am particularly interested in questions or
>>>> thoughts you may have on specific changes we may have to make
>>>> in our 3.0 specs in order to support SAML.
>>>>
>>>> One question raised thus far in last TC meeting was whether SAML
>>>> 1.1 support by ebXML Registry should be required or optional.
>>>> Your thoughts on that issue would be a good starting point.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Kathryn,
>>>
>>> Could we add an agenda item for next week TC con call to discuss
>>> this document please. Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
>>> roster of the OASIS TC), go to
>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
> of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
--
Senior Standards Strategist
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://www.adobe.com
