Mary K:
This is for OASIS to submit work results to UN/CEFACT. We did a project
to determine issues associated with storing UN/CEFACT CCTS in ebXML
Registry-repositories. The intent all along was not to define this
normatively, just collect experience based on real world implementations
and forward the recommendations to UN/CEFACT, likely ATG since the XML
format for CCTS is being worked on their.
Duane
Mary Kay Blantz wrote:
>I'm confused.
>
>The CCTS team is not currently working on anything, so I don't know what
>'work in progress' we would submit.
>
>Please advise.
>
>Mary Kay
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Duane Nickull" <>
>To: <>
>Cc: <>; "Mary Kay Blantz" <>;
>"Stuhec, Gunther" <>; <>
>Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 3:26 PM
>Subject: Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was:
>[regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)
>
>
>
>
>>Kathryn:
>>
>>I have cc'd some of the UN/CEFACT folks. I will present this document
>>during our next telecon so we can kick off the process. I would like to
>>have the one review before we publich this. In the meantime, I will
>>retitle the document "Recommendations to UN/CEFACT for the storage of
>>Core Components and BIE's in an ebXML Registry-Repository".
>>
>>They will then be able to absorb whatever parts of it into their work
>>they need to.
>>
>>Duane
>>
>>Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>We can approve it as a committee approved document. Basic steps are:
>>>
>>>1. Present the document at one of our telecons (just an overview/intro)
>>>2. TC reviews for 2 weeks, sends comments
>>>3. Comments are resolved
>>>4. At the next telecon, TC agrees to vote on the document as a best
>>>practices paper
>>>5. Two week ballot is set up by TC Chair for TC voting
>>>6. If TC approves, the document becomes a TC approved document, and is
>>>posted for public view.
>>>
>>>Let me know when you feel it is ready to present and I will add it to
>>>the agenda.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Kathryn.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:]
>>>Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 8:49 AM
>>>Cc:
>>>Subject: Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was:
>>>[regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)
>>>
>>>
>>>I actually also suggested this to Mark Crawford and others when I was in
>>>
>>>DC. I think it makes sense.
>>>
>>>Before we do this, I would like to wrap the work up slightly. The
>>>easiest way to do this is to change the title to something like
>>>"Recommendations to UN/CEFACT for storage of Core Components in an ebXML
>>>
>>>Registry/Repository" and then approve it as a best practices document
>>>within the TC.
>>>
>>>I am not sure what process we, as a TC, need to go through to approve
>>>this as a non normative document.
>>>
>>>Kathryn?
>>>
>>>Duane
>>>
>>>Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>One important thing I did not mention is that UN/CEFACT is now doing
>>>>two things as part of their ICG Architecture:
>>>>
>>>>1. Define a normative expression syntax in XML for Core Components
>>>>
>>>>2. Define a normative mapping from CCTS Information Model to ebXML
>>>>Registry Information Model
>>>>
>>>>These were 2 important specification that SHOULD have been done by
>>>>CCTS but since they were not we chartered CCRIM SC to do these.
>>>>Now that UN/CEFACT teams are committed to doing this work I propose
>>>>that the CCTS team donate their current work-in-progress as input
>>>>(along with any recommendations) to the UN/CEFACT ICG and CCTS teams
>>>>and recharter to become the liaison and consultant to those teams as
>>>>they define and finalize these two tasks.
>>>>
>>>>Duane and others colleagues. What do you think of this idea?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
>>>the OASIS TC), go to
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgr
>>>oup.php.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
