Duane Nickull wrote:
>
> Matt:
>
> Cool! This could be a very good idea. The only other competitor idea
> was to use UDDI as a locator/binding discovery service for ebXML
> Registries however the issue of how to locate the UDDI server in the
> first place would replace the problem DNS-SD solves so I favor this
> approach. Besides that, both UDDI and ebXML Registry can use the DNS-SD
> approach.
>
> I would like to suggest to the TC that we schedule this for either our
> F2F (if we get time) or next teleconference. Matt is coming to NO so
> perhaps he could be there in person to present how this could work
> although I think I could also present it if he is busy.
+1
> As a sidenote, I am in Amsterdam for XML Europe 2004 with Farrukh. Just
> about every talk I attended ( I don't count mine) today had a long range
> roadmap that included a "Registry".
Unfortunately this does not seem to be the case with the US-based XML
conference (at least those up to now).
> Most favor use of the ebXML Registry system for its feature set and ease of use.
See comment just above.
Joe
> I see that Registries will likely become a pervasive technology as the P2P SOA
> architectures continue to grow. Here is my quote:
>
> "Registries will become to SOA what the search engines are to the internet."
>
> Duane Nickull
>
> --
> Senior Standards Strategist
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://www.adobe.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
--
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
