Re: [regrep] [Fwd: [regrep-semantic] IBM BI-ICS]

David RR Webber wrote:

>Joe,
>
>OK - despite Scott saying that BC-ICS is not IBMs answer to CAM,
>the fact remains that if you have CAM, which we do, CAM is available
>in open source - and an OASIS spec' - then there is absolutely no
>earthly reason why you would want to do ICS instead.
>  
>
+1

We should not even consider a spec until it is in an open standards body.
Next we should not encourage specs that duplicate existing specs within
open standards orgs.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh