Rex Brooks wrote:
> Yup. CAP 1.1 might benefit from integrating the ebXML Registry
> subscription model, and I will mention it when the appropriate time
> comes.
That would be good. You can count on help from myself and other TC
members when the time is right to help as needed.
> I'm not sure that WSRP TC would be interested, since it is a bit more
> specialized, but it's a thought.
Funny you should mention it. There is a lot of interest in WSRP using
ebXML Registry. Joe and I are working actively with WSRP to author a
Tech Note on using ebXML Registry to publish WSRP Services. A relevant
thread is at:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrp-pfb/200312/msg00003.html
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Farrukh
