Farrukh,
The draft of the proposed Semantic Content Management Subcommittee is
very well written and pretty all inclusive. However, I have a couple
questions:
·
Is there a need to augment the RIM with an ebXML Registry
Ontology?
·
Is there a need to discuss the difference between Object Oriented
design methodologies and Ontology Oriented design methodologies?
·
Is there a need to discuss ontology tool support?
·
Is there a need to discuss Agent Management Systems (AMS) like
FIPA and FIPA implementations like JADE?
Zachary Alexander
The IT Investment Architect
ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325
http://www.ebTDesign.com
http://www.p2pspeaker.com
http://www.p2peconomy.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 3:41 PM
To:
Subject: [regrep] Draft Resolution: Semantic Content Management Subcommittee
Team,
Based upon Kathryn's instructions I have prepared the following *DRAFT*
resolution for your review regarding the proposal to form a new
Subcommittee of the ebXML Registry TC to focus on alignment with the
semantic web. The wording below will be finalized based upon your
input
on this thread in the next few days.
Proposed Subcommittee Name: Semantic Content Management SC (SCMSC)
Proposed Charter:
The SCMSC will define use cases and requirements for managing semantic
content within the ebXML Registry 4.0. It will seek to establish a formal
liaison with relevant groups within the Semantic Web Activity (SWA) at W3C.
Early in its life cycle, the SCMSC will actively engage the SWA relationship
and solicit their help to validate requirements. The requirements must include
the ability to utilize ontolgies for classifying RegistryObjects and to enable
intelligent discovery using ontology based queries.
The SCMSC will identify specific Semantic Web technologies (e.g. RDF,
OWL) that are necessary to support the requirements identified for semantic
content management.
Ultimately, the SCMSC will deliver the detailed technical specification
for adding semantic content management capabilities in the registry. The
proposal will address changes to RIM, XML Schema, Relational Schema and
Registry Service interfaces that will be necessary to support the new features.
Proposed List of Deliverables:
The SCMSC will be responsible for the following concrete deliverables:
-Slide Presentation: Includes, Use cases, Requirements, Motivations,
Assumptions and Overview of Technical proposal.
-Detailed Technical proposal on Semantic Content Management. This will
incorporated into the specs as spec content once approved.
-Paper on "Semantic Content Management using the ebXML
Registry". Venue for submission of paper will be determined later.
Proposed SC Chair: Farrukh Najmi
Proposed SC Co-chair: Carl Mattocks
--
Regards,
Farrukh
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
of the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
