Re: [regrep] Fwd: Re: [emergency] infrastructure white patper

Yes (but not exclusively) - see attached

> Would you happen to have more info on what the EM TC is looking at? Is
> this the Common Alert Protocol (CAP)?
> 
> Joe
> 
> Carl Mattocks wrote:
> > 
> > I believe the [emergency] Infrastructure TC could exploit the ebXMLRegistry even though they are focused on a distinct form of 'Emergency Messaging' .
> > ---------------------------------
> > 
> > <Michael Wilson wrote>
> > 
> > ref: In¡Pfra¡Pstruc¡Pture Whitepaper
> > For items of
> > „h Member Registry
> > „h Security and Authentication
> > „h Privacy Assurance
> > „h Active and Passive Data Repository
> > „h Interface Management
> > 
> > ... components of specific theoretical structural and process standards that provided additive value in the context of the above ....
> > </mw>
> > 
> > you should consider including the ebXMLRegistry. The TC is actively planning a 'demonstration' at XML 2003 focused on 'medical alerts'
> > 
> > I can act as liason if you see a fit.
> > 
> > carl
> > 
> > Carl Mattocks CEO CHECKMi
> > 
> > CarlCHECKMI (IM)
> > voicemail:(usa) 908 322 8715
> > ***********************************
> > Trusted Business Agents
> > Semantically Smart Compendiums
> > ***********************************
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>