Kathryn,
And if I may say so - now the JC assumes more significance (not that this
was not
always important).
I also noticed this reference to the TAB - and I would pro-offer the
following link in that regard:
http://www.ebxmlforum.org/articles/ebFor_Grph01_20030708.html
>As to the second point, the TAB is developing a flexible map or model of
>the standards landscape, and it is my feeling that this can be used to
>capture the compatibility relationships desired. We will take this as
>input into the design of its infrastructure.
>
Thanks, DW.
http://drrw.net
