Farrukh:
You make a great case and points for OO. I have to agree and conclude
that it is probably the only candidate based on the requirements.
I always felt it was a bit ironic that we used MS products to express a
standard that MS never really embraced. It is even funnier that we
often use PPT format to talk about it.
/d
Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> Changed subject title to protect the innocent...
>
>
>> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> BTW I like the idea of having HTML version of specs available
>>> online. I propose we do this for our specs as well. Any objections?
>>
>>
>
>
> Duane Nickull wrote:
>
>> Docbook?
>
>
> Actually all I was thinking is to save the document as HTML. This is a
> cheap and mindless act.
>
> The current spec source in in Word. It has several problems due to
> limitations in Word for large documents. Longer term I would like to
> move away from Word. I was thinking of Open Office which is the basis
> for the Open Office Format TC:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office
>
> Important criterea for choice of formats are:
>
> -Open format (ideally XML)
>
> -WYSIWYG Editors that are useable and reliable
>
> -Ideally freely available software
>
> Open Office meets each of the above requirements. Software is freely
> available from:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org
>
> Also since it can open Word formats migration from Word to Open Office
> would be relatively painless.
>
> What do people (and specialy Sally) think?
>
>
--
***************************************************
Yellow Dragon Software - http://www.yellowdragonsoft.com
Web Services & ebXML Messaging / Registry Downloads
Project Team Lead - UN/CEFACT eBusiness Architecture
Phone: +1 (604) 738-1051 - Canada: Pacific Standard Time
Direct: +1 (604) 726-3329
