Farrukh:
Would this be a sort of loosely coupled federation model? Something
like Regisry A has an intrinsic Registry Object "X". Registry B and
Registry A have a CPA that allows them to send queries between each
other. Registry B makes an Entry for Registry Object "X" but uses the
HTTP accessor to reference it. A query to Registry A or B to "get" the
RO "X" would result in either Registry sending the get() to the same
location.
Or would you envision something more elaborate?
Duane
Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>IMO, we should demonstrate interop between 2 or more ebXML Registry
>implementations using a distributed registry scenario based on partial
>implementation of 2.5 specs. I am willing to commit to that for the ebxmlrr
>implementation. Would Yellow Dragon and other vendors be interested in such
>an interop demo between ebXML Registries.
>
>In addition I would like to propose that the interop demo include other
>ebXML specs and in particular ebXML Messaging and CPPA.
>
>Imagine a demo that is the next incarnation of the ebMS interop demo we did
>at XML Europe 2003. Only this time the CPPAs are maintained in multiple
>ebXML Registries and there are references between content in one registry
>and content oin another.
>
>As they say "charity begins at home"
>
>--
>Farrukh
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:23 PM
>To: Breininger Kathryn R
>Cc: ebXML Regrep (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: [regrep] FW: [chairs] Spec/Standard Interop Demo at XML
>2003
>
>
>Perhaps interoperability between ebXML Registry and UDDI?
>
>Joe
>
>"Breininger, Kathryn R" wrote:
>
>
>>Please take a look at the email below. I would like to add this to our
>>
>>
>agenda for our next meeting.
>
>
>>Kathryn
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: dee schur [mailto:]
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:41 PM
>>To:
>>Subject: [chairs] Spec/Standard Interop Demo at XML 2003
>>
>>Dear Chairs,
>>We have been approached by IDEAlliance with what seems like a terrific
>>opportunity with enough lead time to actually accomplish the mission at
>>hand. As you may know, XML 2003 <http://www.xmlconference.org/xmlusa/>
>>will occur in Philly from 7-12 December. They would like to expand the
>>program to include interoperability demonstrations of OASIS approved specs
>>and
>>standards. We have had a lot of success with these types of demos in the
>>past, therefore, we would like to encourage you and your TC to consider
>>this option. We are looking for at least four member vendors with stable
>>implementation products to commit to each spec/standard demo. We have
>>flexibility with scheduling and space.
>>Please discuss this with your TC and feel free to contact me with
>>questions or concerns. I am available to help orchestrate the demos and
>>assist
>>with logistics.
>>Regards,
>>Dee
>>
>>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
>>
>>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/chairs/members/leave_workgroup.
>php
>
>
>>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
>>
>>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.
>php
>
>
>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php
>
>
--
***************************************************
Yellow Dragon Software - http://www.yellowdragonsoft.com
Web Services & ebXML Messaging / Registry Downloads
Project Team Lead - UN/CEFACT eBusiness Architecture
Phone: +1 (604) 738-1051 - Canada: Pacific Standard Time
Direct: +1 (604) 726-3329
