Re: [regrep] UDDI as the registry for ebXML components: Typo?

From
Anne Thomas Manes <>
Date
2003-07-02T16:09:20+00:00
ID
01bd01c340b6$7ffb5870$6f01a8c0@TPX21
Thread
Re: [regrep] UDDI as the registry for ebXML components: Typo?
I doubt that very many people will abandon .NET, WebLogic, WebSphere, etc.
in favor of an ebMS solution. I know that BEA provides some ebXML support as
an add-on product to WebLogic, but what news from IBM and Microsoft? Does
anyone expect that these vendors plan to provide full support for an ebXML
infrastructure?

Based on current product offerings, I think it's fair to say that ebXML and
Web services require different infrastructures.

So I take it that you are requesting that the TN provide a little more
background information on what is meant by ebXML and Web services
infrastructure? That seems eminently reasonable.

Anne

----- Original Message -----
From: "David RR Webber - XML ebusiness" <>
To: "Anne Thomas Manes" <>
Cc: "Chiusano Joseph" <>;
<>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [regrep] UDDI as the registry for ebXML components: Typo?


> Anne,
>
> Yes - but not to infer anything beyond that.    For instance its entirely
> possible to buy an ebMS solution from a vendor who has already
> incorporated WSDL/ simple SOAP support - so the one product
> can provide a combined delivery system.
>
> So now how does that sit with the statement that there is "significant
> overhead", clearly it does not.
>
> It would be acceptable to point out that ebXML requires support
> for ebMS and that more details on that are available at their site.
>
> DW.
> =========================================================
> Message text written by "Anne Thomas Manes"
> >You can register both SOAP/WSDL
> services and ebXML services in a UDDI registry. Of course you can say the
> same for an ebXML registry. But this is a UDDI TN, so it makes sense for
> this TN to explain how to use UDDI to support both environments.
> <
>