Re: [regrep] Does Registry need Business Analytics/BusinessIntelligence Capabilities?

<Quote>
I've always felt that patterns of business is the right story - and of
course that is where ebXML is very strong.  
</Quote>

David, this is not disagreement but rather interest in hearing more:
Would you like to offer up a use case or two?

Joe

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> Zachary,
> 
> Definately - the registry is looking for the 'killer app'.
> 
> The UDDI yellow/white/green page thing clearly
> was not it - so now we're back to more mundane
> items - like WSDL definitions tracking - and UDDI
> touting the same functionality as ebXML Registry.
> 
> I've always felt that patterns of business is the
> right story - and of course that is where ebXML
> is very strong.   And the ebXML registry has
> the right model and RIM to support that.  The
> tModel approach is less compelling in this
> context.
> 
> The recent work on BCM and CAM finally hold
> out the promise of having re-usable business
> templates that can be downloaded and used
> from the registry.
> 
> It's taken us a while to get there - but we should
> shortly be able to deploy this with confidence
> and show industry dictionaries actually working
> in the registry.   There-in you will have what
> we've not been able to show people - their own
> semantics fully functional in the registry working
> with their existing in-place transactions and
> processes - not some hypertheotical concept.
> 
> This is where the registry team needs to get
> more focused IMHO - on delivering business
> functional support - instead of fine tuning the
> technical spec's and hoping the business
> functionality will appear to use that.
> 
> DW.
> =======================================
> Message text written by "Zachary Alexander"
> > Anecdote: When I
> first started with UNIX, it was cool just to know the operating system
> but the adoption did not take off until we added third party
> applications. <