Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>OUR DIRECTION APPEARS TO BE:
>
>(1) A RIM binding should be created;
>
+1
>
>(2) This binding should be created within the Core Components Review
>subcommittee of the Registry TC;
>
This decision is not my recollection. My suggetsion was to have the
binding be defined and owned by the CCTS team. I will defer to you and
others on this though. My main desire is to keep the binding out of
ebRIM and ebRS specs and keep the ebXML Registry content agnostic
architecturally.
>(3) A Core Components serialization will not be defined (all metadata
>attributes will be specified in a RIM binding)
>
Experience with many pilots suggests that the best approach is to have
an XML format for CCTS content with ebRIM format for CCTS metdata. So I
would reccomend both XML serialization format (outside of binding) and
binding to ebRIM metadata. Again I will defer to you and others on this
point as it does not impact the core registry specs. The real impact of
this decision is on CCTS and if I were CCTS team I would define a
normative XML Schema for CC.
