Claus,
This would be a good first step. It seems as though most people who've
replied are for this idea of convergence in principle, let's see where
this all leads.
Luc, Tom -- Is this okay?
-Matt
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 11:57 PM, Von Riegen, Claus wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> Personally, I would appreciate a convergence. However, it is unlikely
> that we can change UDDI's basic characteristics in terms of its data
> structures, APIs, intra- and inter-registry communication and security
> model.
>
> What about putting this item on the agenda for our next conference
> call in order to find out how many TC members would be willing to
> spend some time on investigating the amount of overlap and possible
> convergence paths?
>
> Best regards,
> Claus von Riegen, SAP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:]
> Sent: Freitag, 27. September 2002 01:24
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: [uddi-spec] ebXML Registry / UDDI Convergence
>
>
> Group,
>
> I know that this is a contentious issue, but I would like to get a
> feeling of where everyone stands with regard to the idea of
> interleaving these two standards into one single registry standard.
> What would be the best way to do this? Should it be done?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew MacKenzie
> VP, Chief Software Architect
> XML Global Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
