+1 on David's response.
David RR Webber - XMLGlobal wrote:
> Zack,
>
> This has come up before. Relevancy is a subjective measure,
> and it seems better that such algorithms be external to the
> main registry specification - that can be applied post-retreival.
>
> However - we did discuss before a 'frequency tracking' measure
> that would say they often a piece of content had been accessed,
> and last accessed date/time. Again this may or may not
> provide useful information since some content may occur in
> query results becuase of some very common word in the
> name or description.
>
> How critical this is right now could be debated. IMHO we
> may want to wait off until we have larger sets of content we
> can use to determine how effective such strategies may be.
>
> DW.
> =====================================================
> Message text written by INTERNET:
> >
> Farrukh,
>
> Is it possible to embed relevancy attributes in Content-Based Discovery?
> I
> was thinking that maybe a user would want to check multiple registries and
> analyze the results. So registry 1 may say that an entry is 95% and
> registry 2 may say that the entry is 40%. This would mean that the
> attributes would be transient.
>
> 2nd would it be possible to embed a "pitch" in the entry and evaluate the
> "pitch."
>
> zack<
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
--
Regards,
Farrukh
