RE: [regrep] Minutes of today's meeting

From
CHIUSANO, Joseph <>
Date
2002-08-09T13:49:39+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [regrep] Minutes of today's meeting
Title: RE: [regrep] Minutes of today's meeting

Ah, I see...so, for 
instance, if the UBL representation of Organization and the registry class for 
organization matched, the registry could potentially accept a UBL transaction 
containing Organization information as a means to create an instance of an 
Organization class within the registry, thereby alleviating the need for a user 
to enter this information.  The same could apply for class PostalAddress, 
class PersonName, etc.

 

I like this idea, but I 
would offer a caveat (as I mentioned in our call yesterday) that if the UBL 
representation of Organization were to change (for example, an element is no 
longer mandatory), the RIM class would need to be updated (which as we know 
would not be an easy change).

 

As we know, this type of 
thing is much better enforced with schemas. :)

 

Thanks,

Joe

 

************************************************************************** 

  Joseph M. Chiusano 
  Logistics Management Institute 
  2000 Corporate Ridge 
  
McLean, VA 22102 
  Email: 
 
  Tel: 571.633.7722 

************************************************************************** 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Nikola 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 
  9:37 AM
To: ebXML Regrep (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [regrep] 
  Minutes of today's meeting

  
<JoesAddition> 
The specific 
  issue has to do with whether or not the registry should enforce compatibility 
  with various standards (UBL, etc.).  Nikola described a scenario in which 
  the registry would verify that a certain component (e.g. Address) "conforms" 
  to a certain standard - e.g. the UBL version of Address.

  
</JoesAddition>

  
 

  
What I was trying to communicate was that Core 
  Components Review subcommittee should investigate whether our RIM classes, 
  like Organization ... could be compatible with CC, UBL ... and if yes, what 
  would be necessary to do. This would be a low priority item at this time. In 
  case that we can reuse some of these components, registry would be able to 
  reuse available component validation and other routines / services for that 
  component to process its own components.

  
 

  
Nikola