resending...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Breininger, Kathryn R
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:36 AM
> To: 'ebXML Regrep'
> Subject: FW: Reg Rep Requirement for UID scheme - Question?
>
> Team,
> I have a question that came in about the UIDs. I have forwarded the note.
> Let's talk about this during our telecon tomorrow.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warner, Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:42 AM
> To: Breininger, Kathryn R
> Subject: Reg Rep Requirement for UID scheme - Question?
>
>
> Kathryn
> Did you see my note from the Seattle EBTWG meeting and my question about a
> Reg Rep Requiremetn that all UIDs be 6 digits random. Can you verify that
> Reg Rep owns UID spec and that this is correct?
>
> MY original note:
> I attempted to contribute the Aerospace Industry UDEF Code to the Core
> Component team as a logical identification method for the Core Components
> Universal ID requirement. I was assured that the UID was only a temporary
> numbering scheme to be assigned for "CCs in work". The CC leadership
> deferred to the Registry and Repository Team (in OASIS) for actual
> consideration of any logical UID. They said that Reg Rep folks were
> already looking at a more logical identification scheme, such as UDEF, for
> final UID of CCs. However, the OASIS RegRep folks are the ones who
> specified that the UID is to be 6 digits. It sounds like a buck passing
> exercise. (Do we have anyone who can track down the facts?) Kathryn??
>
>
> Thanks
> Tom
