Based
on the changes that I completed this evening, my "comfort" level with this
document has gone up considerably. If it is not too late (or early
...hmm....), I would like to change my vote to Approve.
The
only major change that has not been made (and will not be made this week) is
consolidating Section 8.2.2.
-Anne
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Fischer
[mailto:]
Sent: December 04, 2001 6:58
PM
To: Regrep
Subject: FW: [regrep] Forwarding
Ballot
All,
I
"Reply" instead of "Reply to All"
-Anne
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Fischer
[mailto:]
Sent: December 04, 2001 3:16
PM
To: Lisa Carnahan
Subject: RE: [regrep] Forwarding
Ballot
Disapprove.
I
have been busy editing RS and have not had an opportunity to actually
read the documents. I know that there is a section in Query that would
be better served by some condensing as Nikola has suggested to me. I
would am not convinced that we have dotted our i's and crossed our t's on this
document. My comfort level is not where it needs to be to send it on to
OASIS. However, I am but one vote.
-Anne
-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Carnahan
[mailto:]
Sent: November 30, 2001 6:48
AM
To:
Subject: [regrep]
Forwarding Ballot
Ballot name: Forwarding
Specifications
Ballot statement: "If both the OASIS/ebXML
Registry Services Specification, v1.08 and the OASIS/ebXML Registry
Information Model, v1.12 are approved by the OASIS/ebXML Registry Technical
Committee, then both documents should be put forward for an OASIS membership
ballot according to Section 2, Standards Process defined at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.shtml
."
Please indicate whether you approve, disapprove or abstain with
the action delineated in above statement. Please send your vote
directly to the Registry TC list by December
5.
--lisa
