[regrep] Latest Schema files (fixed bugs reported by Neil)

Team,

Attached are the latest schema files with bug identified by Neil fixed.

One open issue Neil raised that is unresolved and requires some inout is
whether we should allow a Package to contain RegistryObjects as an
option to specifying Package via Associations:

So instead of:

  <rim:RegistryPackage id = "acmePackage2" >
   <Name xmlns = "">
    <LocalizedString value = "RegistryPackage #2"/>
   </Name>
   <Description xmlns = "">
    <LocalizedString value = "ACME's package #2"/>
   </Description>
  </rim:RegistryPackage>

  <rim:ObjectRef id = "urn:uuid:a2345678-1234-1234-123456789012"/>

  <rim:Association id = "acmePackage2-alreadySubmittedCPP-Assoc"
associationType = "Packages" sourceObject = "acmePackage2" targetObject
=
"urn:uuid:a2345678-1234-1234-123456789012"/>

Allow as an option:

  <rim:RegistryPackage id = "acmePackage2" >
   <Name xmlns = "">
    <LocalizedString value = "RegistryPackage #2"/>
   </Name>
   <Description xmlns = "">
    <LocalizedString value = "ACME's package #2"/>
   </Description>

      <rim:ObjectRef id = "urn:uuid:a2345678-1234-1234-123456789012"/>


  </rim:RegistryPackage>

Note no association specified in second option. The association is
implicitly specified by the containment syntax.

What say you? The change is safe and easy if it is a good thing.


--
Regards,
Farrukh