Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: Please comment on new RIM format

From
Lisa Carnahan <>
Date
2001-08-28T11:45:26+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: Please comment on new RIM format
I like Dan's format; however I argree with the numbering problem. 
Does it make sense to turn the method tables into number'd items? 
That way, attributes have a 3-level number with the title Attribute
(e.g., X.X.X Attribute ID) and methods would be a 3-level number with
the word Method. The work load on this would be heavy; perhaps
Farrukh would want to share the wealth in doing the conversion?

--lisa

At 08:55 PM 8/27/2001 -0700, Yutaka Yoshida wrote:

Personally, I prefer Farrukh's
original one since I see the

same down side - too deep section numberings and TOC is going to

be pretty messy, I guess. As long as all objects have the same

structure of method and attribute, I think it's reasonablly

clear and understandable.

Yutaka Yoshida

Sun Microsystems, XML Technology Center

 > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:38:24 -0400

 > From: Farrukh Najmi <>

 > Subject: Re: Please comment on new RIM format

 > 

 > Dan,

 > 

 > That sounds like a good suggestion as it clearly and further
delineates

 > attributes from methods. However, there is one down side that
I can see.  It

 > would lead to common use of 4 level deep section headers and
occasional use 

of

 > 5 level deep section headers (when dealing with enumeration
values such as

 > objectType). That would be undesirable would it not?

 > 

 > What do people think? Which is a clearer read? Which is more
understandable?

 > 

 > 

 > 

 > Dan Chang wrote:

 > 

 > > Here are my two cents. I think the format will be more
balanced if we have:

 > >

 > >     7.1 Class RegistryObject

 > >         7.1.1
RegistryObject Attributes

 >
>            
7.1.1 Attribute accessControlPolicy

 >
>            
7.1.1.2 Attribute ...

 > >         7.1.2
RegistryObject Methods

 >
>            
7.1.2.1 Method getAssociatedObjects()

 >
>            
7.1.2.2 Method ...

 > >

 > > Regards,  Dan

 > >

 > > e-business Data Technology and Standard

 > > IBM Silicon Valley Laboratory

 > > Notes:     Dan Chang/Santa
Teresa/IBM@IBMUS

 > > Internet:  

 > > VM:         
IBMUSM50(DTCHANG)

 > > Phone:    (408)-463-2319

 > >

 > >
----------------------------------------------------------------

 > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
subscription

 > > manager:
<http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

 > 

 > --

 > Regards,

 > Farrukh

 > 

----------------------------------------------------------------

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription

manager:
<http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
Next in thread → Next in month →