Jeff
To address your concerns about modifcations, I've worked up yet another
package. This does not include a revised scenario but just a revised
schema to include the ability to specify modifications with a level of
detail comparable to the current SPML proposal. The revised schema uses
XPath to identify the items to be modified, as we have been discussing.
Gerry
(See attached file: scenario.zip)
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Jeff Bohren |
| | <jbohren@opennetw|
| | ork.com> |
| | |
| | 03/13/2003 08:03 |
| | PM |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: |
| cc: |
| Subject: [provision] Proposal comparisons... |
| |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I am still not satisfied that we understand enough about how the GW
proposal would implement modifications in order to make a proper decisions.
But I understand we need to close this one way or the other on Monday, so
attached is my summary of how the two approaches compare.
I will be out of the office on Fri, and will be unable to discuss these
issues further until Mon.
Jeff Bohren
OpenNetwork Technologies
#### Proposal_Evaluation_01.doc has been removed from this note on March
14, 2003 by Gearard Woods
