← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Re: [provision] Questions...
I thought this was funny and shared it friends back at The Burton Group. Gary Hein responded: "I think it's great. I can't wait until someone defines a PSML-capable service, something that uses a connector structure called Universal Resource Integration Network Language (URINL). " :-)! Don; Jeff Bohren wrote: > If we ratify PSML, I would suggest that we decide on how to pronounce PSML > before the public does it for us. I'm not too fond of "Pissimal" as a name > for our efforts. > > Jeff Bohren > > Darran Rolls wrote: > > > At Hal's request I have added an agenda item for the next meeting to > > ratify the Provisioning Services Markup Language (PSML) as the umbrella > > name for the specification.... > > > > Darran Rolls > > Waveset Technologies > > MSIM > > AIM drollswaveset > > YIM drolls_waveset > > http://www.waveset.com/ > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Truitt, Edward D. (OSED) [mailto:] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:39 PM > > To: '' > > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > > > That sounds good to me. In fact, that allows us to use "Provisioning > > Services" instead of simply "Provisioning". > > > > -Ed Truitt > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Darran Rolls [mailto:] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:37 PM > > To: Winston Bumpus; ; > > > > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > > > Re 1. I guess the provisioning "framework" would be called PSML - at > > least > > that was the agreed name before November 12th. Is everyone still happy > > with > > that? > > > > Darran Rolls > > Waveset Technologies > > MSIM > > AIM drollswaveset > > YIM drolls_waveset > > http://www.waveset.com/ > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Winston Bumpus [mailto:] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:29 PM > > To: ; > > Subject: Re: [provision] Questions... > > > > Marc, > > > > As for the DSML relevance, there is a presumption at this point that > > some > > of the information will be maintained in a directory, the use of new XML > > protocols for directory interaction may be relevant to this activity. > > > > Winston > > > > >>> "Chanliau, Marc" <> 11/28/01 11:07AM >>> > > I'm new to this TC (I'm a SAML TC member), so please bear with my basic > > questions: > > > > (1) Is there a name for the framework defined by the PSTC (for example, > > the > > Security Services TC (SSTC) defines the SAML framework)? > > (2) In the document called "An Introduction to the Provisioning Services > > Technical Committee," there's a nice representation of the other > > standards > > supported. While I can easily understand the relevance of SOAP > > (messaging), > > SAML (authN and attributes), and XML sig and encryption, I fail to see > > the > > relevance of DSML. Can you explain? > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > -- > Jeff bohren > Product Architect > OpenNetwork Techologies > > (727) 561-9500x219 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread