RE: [openc2] Re: Meeting Times

Stefan,

I do not think the calling everything to vote without some level of 
deliberation is a good way to 'grow the organism'.  We will discuss at the 
next TC and if adequately deliberated, we will vote on it, if not, will 
postpone.  Just because a motion is made and seconded does not mean it 
automatically is called to vote....

-----Original Message-----
From:  [mailto:] On 
Behalf Of Mr. Stefan Hagen
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:26 PM
To: 
Subject: [openc2] Re: Meeting Times

Dear TC members,

I sense quite some balloting in this TC already in its infancy (as an 
organism) and I wonder if this is a good mode for growing this "organism".

It will all work out, I guess - maybe we ease a little more :-?

/Stefan

On 11/07/17 21:00, Bret Jordan wrote:
> We have a motion to change it, and it has been seconded by several
> people.  I guess we just need a ballot to decide what everyone wants.
>
> Bret
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> *From:* Brule, Joseph M <>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 10, 2017 11:00:56 AM
> *To:* dave.lemire; Bret Jordan
> *Cc:* jg; ; 
> *Subject:* RE: [openc2] Re: [EXT] RE: [openc2] Meeting Times
>
> If it simplifies the prioritization and makes sense to you to have a
> meeting at the standard time of 13:00, then by all means do so!  In
> fact I will even go so far as to say let's make 13:00 meeting times a
> conventional practice, but I do NOT see the value in constraining the
> SC chairs, tiger team leads
> etc.  with some immutable 'rule'.   If someone wants to set up a 14:00
> will we
> require a ballot or formal vote to suspend the rule?  I would assume
> that is not anyone's intent.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Lemire [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 10:53 AM
> To: Bret Jordan <>
> Cc: Brule, Joseph M <>; jg <>;
> ; 
> Subject: Re: [openc2] Re: [EXT] RE: [openc2] Meeting Times
>
> I'm in complete agreement that a standard meeting time makes sense. If
> nothing else, it simplifies the prioritization exercise for heavily
> scheduled people.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> David P. Lemire, CISSP
> Systems Engineer, G2, Inc.
> 302 Sentinel Drive, Suite 300
> Annapolis Junction, MD 20701
> Mobile: 443-535-1182
>
> Office: 301-575-5190
>
> Email:  <mailto:>
> Email: 
> <mailto:>
> (for
> FOUO)
> Web: www.g2-inc.com <http://www.g2-inc.com>
> <https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/UoRyNN-kty0yeNrj5CW5FyGfe73jSDx38u
> 05ERD6bkc=?d=q18WFudrj8NlETaZWWi1jRNnVGkUNKJ3JPE2wUOAtBg4Pdht-BeKy6kdC
> XRCCw71uVATQAnrX_Yw-lzRSQRUlEnwgiSfOPl4HUS5xrX8uB9uY7b3v9YfKKdkcUDzGcC
> 8dpZFRgw9FvC09iPXLhBiJferF-I7kXUiG21WuvoiX5NSvqjwy2KvePK7WL-FkWhctuLVb
> c0tw_oLaKGs3ilCVqGn0GeajbOJ3bBcI2xe8Nfma5SdpWxbZaAkMoenn_omHAMK8yYAKdt
> BL-ONZRv3ANDS0HjJAWQ7jB8kS01DDfwOFm_pCpHvQITvbplhOV6hrOqV19lp9Sgu0rk3O
> DCrPdI-xmaCEIidwSbt8iExtYIcYSZldBcft2dQ1n_6HrgL9Eq0bc_Be2mu7wfULbLMIih
> 5a9vg3ay9IUdKetPN1w%3D%3D&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.g2-inc.com>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Bret Jordan
> < <mailto:> > wrote:
>
>
>         The benefits having a standard time far out weight any
> limitations that might occur for a SC.  Give the tempo and amount of
> work we need to do, it would be good to try and have as many people
> engaged as possible. The best way to do that is to have predictable
> times that people can mark off on their calendars.
>
>
>
>
>         There is no guarantee that they will be able to attend all of
> the meetings, but at least they do not need to play wack-a-mole with
> trying to figure out when a meeting is going to take place.
>
>
>
>
>         Bret
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>         From: Brule, Joseph M <
> <mailto:> >
>         Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 5:53:04 AM
>         To: 'jg';  <mailto:> ;
> Bret Jordan; 
> <mailto:>
>         Subject: [EXT] RE: [openc2] Meeting Times
>
>
>         I will make a statement against this proposal;  I am OK with
> the idea of
>         stating that 13:00 Eastern is preferred, but I do not see the
> value in
>         artificially constraining our subcommittee chairs and/or team
> leads.  I
>         disagree with making this some sort of rule (other than a rule
> of thumb)
>
>           VR
>
>         Joe B
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: 
> <mailto:>
> [mailto:
> <mailto:>
> ] On
>         Behalf Of jg
>         Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 9:34 PM
>         To:  <mailto:> ;
>  <mailto:> ;
>  <mailto:>
>         Subject: Re: [openc2] Meeting Times
>
>         OpenC2 Members:
>
>         I also concur on this proposal.
>
>         Jane Ginn, MSIA, MRP
>         Secretary, CTI TC
>         OASIS
>          <mailto:>
>         In U.S.: +(928) 399-0509 <tel:(928)%20399-0509>
>
>
>
>
>         -------- Original Message --------
>         From: "Kirillov, Ivan A." <
> <mailto:> >
>         Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 11:32 AM
>         To: Bret Jordan <
> <mailto:>  >,"
> <mailto:>  "
>         < <mailto:> >
>         Subject: Re: [openc2] Meeting Times
>
>
>
>         I second this motion.
>
>
>
>         Regards,
>
>         Ivan
>
>
>
>         From: <
> <mailto:> > on behalf of Bret Jordan
>         < <mailto:> >
>         Date: Friday, July 7, 2017 at 11:22 AM
>         To: "
> <mailto:> "
> < <mailto:> >
>         Subject: [openc2] Meeting Times
>
>
>
>         All,
>
>
>
>         I would like to motion that we move and set all OpenC2
> meetings to be at
> 13:00
>         ET, regardless of the day.  This will make it easier for
> participants to have
>         predictability in the schedule and will prevent conflicts when
> SC and working
>         groups pick ad-hoc times.
>
>
>
>         Bret
>
>
>
>