Checks on the ODF 1.3 specification in HTML

Dear TC,

I did some tests on the ODF 1.3 HTML specification and would like to share my notes:

MathMLÂ

I was happy, to find out that the 102 Object directories within the ODT ZIP are no OLE Objects, but MathML objects and are represented in the XHTML version as well as MathML und are well rendered.Â

At least, I picked one of the 102 the first "/Object 1" and quickly tested it. You may find it close to the search-string "B-Splines. If the" within the document.Â

I did not check all 102 as I am certain, if there are MathML problems such as rendering, everyone could switch to ODT as a representational document. This is nothing to waste time on.

Images

In ODF 1.2 I used several images aside from the specification. Today there are no longer images aside of the HTML specification, I made a quick test on the existence of a former image.Â

In general, if you search for "data:image", you may found 18 occurances of images: 1 JPEG, 11 GIF and 6 png, similar to

<img style="height:4.8819cm;width:4.8819cm;" alt="" src="">

This looks good as well. Again I have only checked one occurrence for all, but 18 is a number quite similar to the number of the previous pictures.

Broken links

This link checker provided good results ->Âhttps://www.deadlinkchecker.com/website-dead-link-checker.asp

There are two dead links:

StatusURLSource link text

404 Not Foundhttps://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-86-2005.htmlhttp://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-86-2005.html [301 from http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-86-2005.html]

404 Not Foundhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.49.6093http://cites

Grammar File Naming

Last, but not least. This is something, which I find quite annoying and I hope you will fix for the next release. The naming convention of the RNG grammar files was overtaken from ODF 1.0 and not from ODD 1.2, where new grammar files had been added. As I am generating software directly from the files, I would like to handle the file access by automation and only replace the version string.

This is how the ODF 1.2 schema grammars were named:

This is how I want the ODF 1.3 schema files to be named:

But this is how the ODF 1.3 schema files are currently named,Â

seeÂhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/cs01/schemas/Â

Missing the "-cs01" identifierÂ

Having the "-cs01" identifier at the end (similar to ODF 1.0) instead of in the middle as ODF 1.2 or the OWL files.

I suggest we should fix the naming for the next release and use the prior naming convention of ODF 1.2.

Regards,

Svante

Â