wrote on 10/25/2012 10:39:46
AM:
> From: André Rebentisch <>
> To: , ,
> Date: 10/25/2012 10:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [office] Evolving ODF, Interop and
Multiple Implementations
> Sent by:
>
> Dear Rob,
>
> Am 22.10.2012 21:25, schrieb :
> >> I'd like to suggest that we do this based on the existence
of
> >> *multiple implementations* of the new capability, or at least
of
> >> committed plans of multiple implementers to implement the
new capability.
>
> In principle parties are free to implement earlier incarnations of
the
> format.
>
Yes. But that is not really an argument for deciding
what additions we put into ODF 1.3.
> >> In other words, I'd like to discourage adding capabilities
to ODF 1.
> >> 3 unless it promotes interoperability.
>
> Would that speed up the pace of development?
>
Development of the spec or the implementation?
-Rob
> Best,
> André
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
