RE: [oasis-member-discuss] Comments on Artifact ID requirements

Any news or follow up on this?

Regards,

-Peter
---
Peter F Brown

Senior Expert
ICT-Strategy Unit
Austrian Federal Chancellery
---
Chair, CEN eGovernment Focus Group
---
T: +43.1.53115.6161
W: www.cio.gv.at

No trees were cut down in the production of this message; many electrons
were however severely agitated
---
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Drummond Reed [mailto:] 
Sent: 12 August 2005 21:42
To: 'William Cox'
Cc: ; ; 'Wachob,
Gabe'; 'Dave McAlpin'; ; 'James Bryce Clark'
Subject: RE: [oasis-member-discuss] Comments on Artifact ID requirements

Bill,

Thanks much for the offer. I just sent Jamie and Mary another note on a
different topic that underscores why OASIS should look closely at XRI for
its artifact identification.

My biggest challenge right now is bandwidth - I'm booked pretty heavily for
the next two weeks, although Thursday the 25th and the morning of Friday the
26th are possiblities. Starting the week after that it gets better.

For the XRI TC's part I'm volunteering my co-chair Gabe Wachob and XRI
Editor's Subcommittee chair Dave McAlpin (who I know is on vacation this
week).

So my recommendation would be to schedule a call about two weeks out and see
who can make it at that time.

I look forward to the discussion.

Best,

=Drummond 

-----Original Message-----
From: William Cox [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 9:44 AM
To: Drummond Reed
Cc: ; ; 'Wachob,
Gabe'; 'Dave McAlpin'; ; 'James Bryce Clark'
Subject: Re: [oasis-member-discuss] Comments on Artifact ID requirements

Drummond -

I'm interested in such a discussion; I will also volunteer Mary (subject to
Jamie and Mary's veto).

Per the Member Review AIR WD 15.pdf document distributed with AIR WD15,

####################
"7. This document specifies a set of Required Metadata for OASIS artifacts
to be available in the document and/or associated metadata, and also as a
basis for exposing selected metadata in the Artifact Identifier. Comments
would be appreciated on the following plan for XHTML metadata in the next
Working Draft, and would be inserted into section 5.5.2 and 5.5.3 (lines
438-450):

Use the style of "Expressing Dublin Core in HTML/XHTML meta and link
elements," Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Recommendation, November 30,
2003, http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/. The intent is to follow the
style, but not to make normative reference to the Recommendation There will
be one meta element per name-value pair. We may need to define an OASIS
metadata namespace to use as a prefix for the metadata names.
The compatibility for versions of HTML before XHTML 1.0 would parallel that
for the DCMI Recommendation."
####################

Your proposed discussion addresses closely related issues.

When can we get together? This strikes me as a phone discussion at first.

Thanks.

bill cox


Drummond Reed wrote: