Hi Roger,
We (You and I) will reconcile the differences, and then I'll submit to
Patrick. Did you see his comments? Can we respond to this concern?
John G.
I noticed that in the revisions you proposed for the LegalXML MS RoP the
deletion of the last sentence of Section C and the deletion of Sections D &
E. Please provide your reasoning for these deletions.
Also, the language in the original Section F (Funding Model) used the phrase
"Up to 40%" so as to allow for the negotiation of the funding percentage as
part of the annual budgeting process. For example, in 2006, the LegalXML MS
only spent approximately 33% of the budgeted expense funds. If in 2007, the
LegalXML MS fails to spend the budgeted funds, then we (OASIS Staff & the
Steering Committee) need to be able to negotiate a revised membership
funding percentage, without having to revise the RoP each year.
I do not have any objections to the other revisions you indicated.
Patrick Gannon
President & CEO
OASIS
+1.978.667.5115 x201 - office
+1.978.761.3546
- mobile
Skype: pgannon
www.oasis-open.org
